Data Scientist's Toolbox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Adamcolton (talk | contribs) Created page with "== Footer == Category: Notes Category: Course Work Category: Research" |
Adamcolton (talk | contribs) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Video Lectures == | |||
=== Week 1 === | |||
==== Series Motivation ==== | |||
==== The Data Scientist's Toolbox ==== | |||
==== Getting Help ==== | |||
==== Finding Answers ==== | |||
=== Week 3 === | |||
==== Types of Questions ==== | |||
Types of analysis | |||
* descriptive: describe the data, like census | |||
* exploratory: find relationships (not causation) | |||
* inferential: use a small sample to say something about a bigger population | |||
* predictive: use data on some object to predict values for another object (still not causation) | |||
* causal: find out what happens t one variable when you change another variable (very difficult) | |||
* mechanistic: understand the exact changes in variables that lead to changes in other variables (very difficult, next to impossible unless system is nearly deterministic) | |||
==== What is data ==== | |||
Quantative/qualitative. | |||
Data is the second most important thing. The most important thing is the question. | |||
==== What about Big Data ==== | |||
Doesn't really address this, also, I disagree with his approach. I argue that "Big Data" isn't actually determined by size, but structure. If your data-processing architecture is a automated, dynamic network, you're dealing with big data. Otherwise, you're not. | |||
==== Experimental Design ==== | |||
Confounding: hidden variable that effects two observed variables. Look at A→B, what is actually happening is C→B and C. Causes spurious correlation. | |||
* Sensitivity: Pr(positive result | positive) | |||
* Specificity: Pr(negative result | negative) | |||
* Positive Predictive Value: Pr(positive | positive result) | |||
* Negative Predictive Value: Pr(negative | negative result) | |||
* Accuracy: Pr(correct outcome) | |||
== Footer == | == Footer == | ||
[[Category: Notes]] | [[Category: Notes]] | ||
[[Category: Course Work]] | [[Category: Course Work]] | ||
[[Category: Research]] | [[Category: Research]] | ||
Latest revision as of 16:57, 20 January 2015
Video Lectures
Week 1
Series Motivation
The Data Scientist's Toolbox
Getting Help
Finding Answers
Week 3
Types of Questions
Types of analysis
- descriptive: describe the data, like census
- exploratory: find relationships (not causation)
- inferential: use a small sample to say something about a bigger population
- predictive: use data on some object to predict values for another object (still not causation)
- causal: find out what happens t one variable when you change another variable (very difficult)
- mechanistic: understand the exact changes in variables that lead to changes in other variables (very difficult, next to impossible unless system is nearly deterministic)
What is data
Quantative/qualitative.
Data is the second most important thing. The most important thing is the question.
What about Big Data
Doesn't really address this, also, I disagree with his approach. I argue that "Big Data" isn't actually determined by size, but structure. If your data-processing architecture is a automated, dynamic network, you're dealing with big data. Otherwise, you're not.
Experimental Design
Confounding: hidden variable that effects two observed variables. Look at A→B, what is actually happening is C→B and C. Causes spurious correlation.
- Sensitivity: Pr(positive result | positive)
- Specificity: Pr(negative result | negative)
- Positive Predictive Value: Pr(positive | positive result)
- Negative Predictive Value: Pr(negative | negative result)
- Accuracy: Pr(correct outcome)