Opposed Piston Diesel Engine: Difference between revisions
Adamcolton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Adamcolton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I've been looking at [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposed-piston_engine Opposed-piston_engines] and I'm interested in them, particularly the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six-stroke_engine#M4.2B2 M4+2] This is my try at designing one. | I've been looking at [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposed-piston_engine Opposed-piston_engines] and I'm interested in them, particularly the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six-stroke_engine#M4.2B2 M4+2] This is my try at designing one. | ||
A different approach: http://www.gizmag.com/duke-engines-axial/33631/ | A different approach: http://www.gizmag.com/duke-engines-axial/33631/ or this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZB0Go3Kj-k | ||
== Goals == | == Goals == | ||
The goal of the engine is to simplify design. With a focus on fewer parts and easier to fix. Because of CNC manufacturing, the solid parts can be complex and precise, so long as replacing them is simple. | The goal of the engine is to simplify design. With a focus on fewer parts and easier to fix. Because of CNC manufacturing, the solid parts can be complex and precise, so long as replacing them is simple. | ||
Revision as of 16:20, 27 April 2016
Half-baked idea.
I've been looking at Opposed-piston_engines and I'm interested in them, particularly the M4+2 This is my try at designing one.
A different approach: http://www.gizmag.com/duke-engines-axial/33631/ or this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZB0Go3Kj-k
Goals
The goal of the engine is to simplify design. With a focus on fewer parts and easier to fix. Because of CNC manufacturing, the solid parts can be complex and precise, so long as replacing them is simple.
Pistons
The pistons are opposed in a single chamber. I'd like to see if the pistons can be machined with enough precision to not need rings.
Even further in the half baked ideas would be to intentionally leave a very small gap (sub millimeter) to reduce friction. The pistons could be aligned either with air pressure or magnetism (particularly induction).
Timing Profile
I drew out the timing profile, and I think it's possible, though it's interesting.
The piston chamber has a opening at either end for intake and outlet, but no valves. There is a fuel injector closer to the intake side. P1 is the piston on the intake side and P2 is on the outlet side. Position I is the outside edge of the inlet, C is the center (and the point of combustion) and O is the far side of the outlet.
Intake and Combustion
Intake begins with the pistons touching. P2 is driven by a cam linearly from I to C. When P2 is halfway through this motion, P1 beings moving, also linearly, but at twice the speed. The result being that P1 and P2 begin with no gap under the intake, a gap opens up, then closes towards the center. The fuel injector is timed to fire just after P1 closes the intake. The pistons come close enough to compress the air and begin diesal combustion.
Expansion
At this point rather than the cam driving the pistons, the pistons switch over