Stirling Engine: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Adamcolton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Adamcolton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Version 0.1= | * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhTcbg7wujo | ||
==Design== | == Version 0.1 == | ||
=== Design === | |||
Two beta style engines coupled together. | Two beta style engines coupled together. | ||
===Piston=== | ==== Piston ==== | ||
I want to use a piston instead of a diaphragm because it has a larger displacement, more displacement equals more power. I want to build my diaphragm using a steel wool core and some small pieces of metal (coat-hanger?) to reinforce it, pour concrete over that and seal the whole thing with silicon. This should allow me to make any shape I want while still getting a good smooth seal. | I want to use a piston instead of a diaphragm because it has a larger displacement, more displacement equals more power. I want to build my diaphragm using a steel wool core and some small pieces of metal (coat-hanger?) to reinforce it, pour concrete over that and seal the whole thing with silicon. This should allow me to make any shape I want while still getting a good smooth seal. | ||
Revision as of 17:52, 30 August 2013
Version 0.1
Design
Two beta style engines coupled together.
Piston
I want to use a piston instead of a diaphragm because it has a larger displacement, more displacement equals more power. I want to build my diaphragm using a steel wool core and some small pieces of metal (coat-hanger?) to reinforce it, pour concrete over that and seal the whole thing with silicon. This should allow me to make any shape I want while still getting a good smooth seal.
Notes
I saw a video using metal water bottles for the chamber - metal and already very smooth.