Model Thinking Notes: Difference between revisions
Adamcolton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Adamcolton (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
===E=== | ===E=== | ||
*Ex. banks, showed interdependence and why some were saved | |||
*Monty Hall problem | |||
=Readings= | =Readings= | ||
Revision as of 22:51, 12 March 2012
Lectures
1
A
- Why use models?
- Lots of fields use models
- Models produce clearer thinking, make you a better thinker
- Use and understand data
- Decide, Strategize and design
B
How models make you a better citizen of the world
- "All models are wrong, but some are useful" George EP Box
- Models are the language of business, academia, non-profit, almost all purposes
- Models give us the conditions under which rules are best applied
- Formal models do better than any semi-formal technique
- Models are fertile, a model designed for one system can often be cross applied to other domains
- Models make us humble
C
How models make us clear thinkers
- Step 1: Name the parts
- Step 2: Identify the relationships (between those parts and how things play out)
- Outcomes: Equilibrium, cycle, random, complex
- Identify logical boundaries (identify conditions under which to apply rules)
- Use models to communicate
D
Models and Data
- Models reveal patterns in data
- Models predict points based on given data
- Produces bounds (ex. in ten years inflation will between 0% and 3%)
- Retrodiction (predicting the past), also good for testing the model
- Prediction other factors (the heliocentric universe model predicted neptune)
- Inform data collection
- Estimate hidden parameters
- Calibration
E
- Ex. banks, showed interdependence and why some were saved
- Monty Hall problem
Readings
Why Model?
By: Joshua M. Epstein
- Everyone models, but most models are implicit rather than explicit
- Reasons besides predictions to build modles
- Explain
- Guide data collection
- Illuminate core dynamics
- Suggest dynamical analogies
- Discover new questions
- Promote a scientific habit of mind
- Bound (bracket_ outcomes to plausible ranges
- Illuminate core uncertainties
- Offer crisis options in near-real time
- Demonstrate tradeoffs / suggest efficiencies
- Challenge the robustness of prevailing theory through perturbations
- Expose prevailing wisdom as incompatible with available data
- Train practitioners
- Discipline the policy dialogue
- Educate the general public
- Reveal the apparently simple (complex) to be complex (simple)
- Many models are fertile, they cross apply to many unrelated domains
The Model Thinker: Prologue, Introduction and Chapter 1
Prologue
We have access to a lot of information. Models are the best means to parse it and choose which rules to apply to it.
Introduction
Combining information with models and contrasting it with facts can lead to decisions (Iceland bank example).
Models don't so much have flaws as they have limited scope. Newtonian physics is an 'incorrect' model with broad application. Multiple models help to compensate by extending scope or focusing scope. Many physical systems can be modeled with a single model or at least explain why they are too complex to model. Human systems tend to be more complex.
- Single Model fallacy - the idea we only need a single best model.
- Ration Choices - most models assume humans make rational choices, but we often do not. In high stakes, low complexity people act rational. In high complexity, well, it's complex.
Phil Tetlock found that single model thinkers, what he called hedgehogs, were worse than random at foretelling the future. It is better to use multiple models.
Chapter 1
- Supertanker example - increasing a tankers size increases it's surface area by a square power but it's volume cubically.
- The same model can explain that elephants have a slower metabolism than mice.