Opposed Piston Diesel Engine: Difference between revisions

From Adam Colton
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Half-baked idea.
Half-baked idea.


I've been looking at [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposed-piston_engine Opposed-piston_engines] and I'm interested in them, particularly the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six-stroke_engine#M4.2B2 M4+2]. I really like [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGaISFg_ZIw this] one and [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Gcaoel6QFY this too]. This is my try at designing one.
I've been looking at [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposed-piston_engine Opposed-piston_engines] and I'm interested in them, particularly the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six-stroke_engine#M4.2B2 M4+2]. I really like [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGaISFg_ZIw this] one and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Gcaoel6QFY this too]. This is my try at designing one.


A different approach: http://www.gizmag.com/duke-engines-axial/33631/ or this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZB0Go3Kj-k
A different approach: http://www.gizmag.com/duke-engines-axial/33631/ or this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZB0Go3Kj-k

Revision as of 18:28, 27 April 2016

Half-baked idea.

I've been looking at Opposed-piston_engines and I'm interested in them, particularly the M4+2. I really like this one and this too. This is my try at designing one.

A different approach: http://www.gizmag.com/duke-engines-axial/33631/ or this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZB0Go3Kj-k

Goals

The goal of the engine is to simplify design. With a focus on fewer parts and easier to fix. Because of CNC manufacturing, the solid parts can be complex and precise, so long as replacing them is simple.

Pistons

The pistons are opposed in a single chamber. I'd like to see if the pistons can be machined with enough precision to not need rings.

Even further in the half baked ideas would be to intentionally leave a very small gap (sub millimeter) to reduce friction. The pistons could be aligned either with air pressure or magnetism (particularly induction).

Timing Profile

I drew out the timing profile, and I think it's possible, though it's interesting.

The piston chamber has a opening at either end for intake and outlet, but no valves. There is a fuel injector closer to the intake side. P1 is the piston on the intake side and P2 is on the outlet side. Position I is the outside edge of the inlet, C is the center (and the point of combustion) and O is the far side of the outlet.

I think the piston cams will be wedged between two camshafts - one to push and one to pull.

Intake and Combustion

Intake begins with the pistons touching. P2 is driven by a cam linearly from I to C. When P2 is halfway through this motion, P1 beings moving, also linearly, but at twice the speed. The result being that P1 and P2 begin with no gap under the intake, a gap opens up, then closes towards the center. The fuel injector is timed to fire just after P1 closes the intake. The pistons come close enough to compress the air and begin diesel combustion.

The compression ration needs to be about 25:1.

It may also make sense to put the fuel injector just outside the intake and fire it just as P2 begins to move.

Expansion

At this point rather than the cam driving the pistons, the pistons switch over to deliver power. So the