Republican Debate: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Adamcolton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Adamcolton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* Blocked due process for 293 days then elected a rapist who appointed a rapist | * Blocked due process for 293 days then elected a rapist who appointed a rapist | ||
* Calling republicans racist is a compliment because it ignores the misogyny, xenophobia and homophobia. | * Calling republicans racist is a compliment because it ignores the misogyny, xenophobia and homophobia. | ||
* Assert foundation fascism, then when accepted, tag it as such | |||
** ruling class | |||
** ultra-nationalism | |||
Revision as of 00:33, 4 December 2019
Tactics
Do not explain, if the facts are on your side assert and cite (disproved by Snopes and Politifact).
Challenge their assumption but argue as though they already agree with yours.
Don't fight on minutia, always force the larger issue; the GOP has stood on the grounds of racism and exploitation of the poor since Goldwater. The modern GOP is a hate group.
Attack dropped points. If the argument shifts, push it back and force a concession on the point.
If there is an audience, address them directly. Acknowledge the show and shut it down.
Attack Authority and In-Group, this is the heart of the issue.
Concise
- Blocked due process for 293 days then elected a rapist who appointed a rapist
- Calling republicans racist is a compliment because it ignores the misogyny, xenophobia and homophobia.
- Assert foundation fascism, then when accepted, tag it as such
- ruling class
- ultra-nationalism